May 17, 2012

Cong. Smith takes input from Nebraskans on building new Farm Bill

Cong. Adrian Smith

The House and Senate versions of the Farm Bill will look much different, according to Nebraska Congressman Adrian Smith.

During a recent public meeting near Crofton, Smith says farmers told him the Senate version would cover shallow losses under crop insurance, but they want the House to include catastrophic coverage.

Smith says that will only happen with the current budget problems if farmers pay higher premiums.

“I hear from producers across the 3rd District of Nebraska who want to go more toward that deep, deep loss,” Smith says. “That’s a principal of risk management in general where you really buy insurance for the more catastrophic events rather than some of the other dips that can take place.”

Farmers told Smith they support the Senate eliminating direct payments and target prices, however that was heavily criticized by House Ag Committee Chairman Frank Lucas. Smith says those programs will be tough to defend.

“I don’t think he will succeed in restoring direct payments,” Smith says. “Practically every meeting I’ve had, which is several across rural Nebraska in the 3rd District, they tell me that direct payments are unnecessary, in fact sometimes are even counterproductive. I don’t see that part of farm policy coming back.”

Smith says while both chambers would like to pass a Farm Bill by fall, a short-term extension is possible until after the November election.

By Jerry Oster, WNAX, Yankton

BPI cannot shake “pink slime” tag, decides to close three plants

The tag “pink slime” seems to be too much to shake, no matter how hard Beef Products Inc. attempted to get the public to use its preferred label “lean, finely textured beef”.

The uproar over pink slime sent sales sinking and has now caused BPI to announce it will close processing plants in three states this month, keeping a plant in Nebraska open at a reduced capacity. The closures will cost 650 workers their jobs. The company plans to close plans in Amarillo, Texas; Garden City, Kansas; and Waterloo, Iowa on May 25th. A plant in South Sioux City, Nebraska will remain open.

The company is based in South Dakota. It blamed the loss in sales which led to the decision to close plants on unfounded attacks on a product that has been used as a filler for years. BPI produces the product by heating bits of beef and treating them with small amounts of ammonia to kill bacteria. It meets federal food safety standards.

Critics used social media to spread concern about the product, calling it “pink slime”. The label became a byword among agricultural groups which work hard to overcome the tag and assure the public the product was safe. Nothing seemed to work. An online petition seeking to end its use in schools attracted hundreds of thousands of supporters.

“The recent news BPI will be permanently laying off 650 workers due to a baseless media scare is extremely unsettling. There are real life consequences when we stray from using sound science to determine product safety,” Congressman Adrian Smith.

Nebraska Farm Bureau President Steve Nelson also blamed the closings on the media uproar over the product.

“We are saddened to learn that 650 hard-working Americans will be without jobs due to a misinformation media frenzy that inaccurately and unfairly targeted a beef product that has been deemed safe by USDA since 1974,” Nelson said in a written statement.

“The closure of these plants and the inability of lean, finely textured beef to recover from the baseless negative exposure it received is exactly why Nebraska Farm Bureau expressed disappointment directly to USDA in a letter to the agency questioning its decision to offer alternatives to lean, finely textured beef through its school lunch programs. That decision only furthered unfounded fears about the safety of the product. It is our opinion that USDA failed in its mission to use science to base its decisions.”

TransCanada seeks permit for Keystone XL, Critics speak out

TransCanada today submitted a new application for a permit for the Keystone XL Oil Pipeline.

While TransCanada says the new route avoids the environmentally sensitive areas of the Sand Hills, Bold Nebraska’s Jane Kleeb is skeptical.

“This pipeline not only crosses the Sand Hills, but the Ogalala Aquifer,” Kleeb says. “It’s the largest source of fresh water… not only in the United States, but around the world as well.”

Susan Casey-Lefkowitz with the Natural Resources Defense Council accuses Transcanada of rushing a new application and not doing a new environmental review. She says it is critical that there is a new environmental review completed.

Kleeb says citizens continued to raise concerns about the new route during a meeting in Neligh, Nebraska last night.

Kleeb says property owners feel like their rights are being discounted in favor of the $7-billion, 1,700 mile-long pipeline.

UNL receives grant to help create new agricultural policy structures

The University of Nebraska – Lincoln received a two-year grant totaling more than $766,000 from the U-S Department of Agriculture to establish a new policy research group within the Center for Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization. UNL agricultural economics professor Dr. Konstantinos Giannakas will lead this research project that takes a close look at all consumers and producers and analyze each and use that data to establish more accurate and effective policies.

Dr. Giannakas stated “This will allow us to determine the affects of different policies on different consumer and producer groups.”

Dr. Giannakas says there are many different types of consumers and producers and the ag policies in place now do not take individual preferences, income, and other factors into consideration. He stated, “rarely are we able to go and say this is going to happen to the low income consumers or with consumers with aversions or say strong preference to organic food or producers that less efficient, smaller producers so this framework that our group will be developing will allow us to take up agricultural policies and determine exactly the market and welfare effect, how different groups will be affected by those policies.”

Once developed, this new framework will be used to analyze important policy issues, including market potential and best regulatory response to food nanotechnology to policies relating to downstream water pollution issues, least-cost policies, rural economic development and much more.

USDA report finds corn planting rocketing ahead of last year

The latest USDA report shows Nebraska farmers are making good progress in their fields.

The Husker State’s corn crop is 44% planted, well ahead of last year’s 12%. Only 6% of the soybeans are in, which is also ahead of the average for this date of 2%. Oats are 93% planted.

Paul Bertels, an economist with the National Corn Growers Association, says things are looking good across the region, so far.

“There’s a lot of things that can happen between now and fall but from what we hear, they’re off to a good start,” Bertels says.

Corn prices remain at more than $6 a bushel, but Bertels says a record or near-record crop would push that down somewhat. He says early planting across the Corn Belt could make for an excellent harvest.

“Right now, moisture does not seem to be a problem in most of the Corn Belt, either too much or too little,” he says. “This cold weather over the past two weeks is a little troubling and it might slow the emergence down a bit, but things are off to a good start.”

In the 18 states that grow the vast majority of the nation’s corn, 53% of the crop is in the ground.