February 4, 2012

Gov. Heineman says state will wait on health insurance exchange (AUDIO)

Gov. Dave Heineman insists Nebraska won’t default to the federal government in creating a state health insurance exchange, but the governor tells Nebraska Radio Network he wants to wait until the legal status of the federal health care law is determined.

In his State of the State address, Heineman declared that the state is moving forward with planning and designing a state health insurance exchange. He stated the state has worked hard for the past two years on that portion of the federal health care overhaul. Heineman asserted “…Nebraska will not default to the federal government regarding a health insurance exchange.”

Heineman, during an interview with Nebraska Radio Network, addresses criticism about waiting to create the exchange. He says it doesn’t make sense to move forward now.

“I think anybody with a little common sense wouldn’t make a major decision about this knowing that within 90 days of that decision, the United States Supreme Court could rule it unconstitutional,” Heineman says. “I’m saying; just use a little common sense here.”

The state has run on two-tracks regarding the federal healthcare law. It has been working to implement the mandates of the law even as it has joined with 25 other states to challenge its constitutionality.

The Supreme Court agreed to hear the challenge to the 2010 healthcare law during oral arguments in March. A decision could be handed down by the court in late June.

Heineman tells us that doing anything more than planning could prove to be a waste of time if the Obama Administration loses in court.

“So, I just say, ‘Hey, let’s wait for the decision, but let’s don’t us make a major decision till we know how the court has acted,’” Heineman says.

AUDIO: Brent Martin reports [:40]

AUDIO: Brent Martin interviews Gov. Heineman on a state healthcare exchange [2:20]

Voters might decide to enshrine hunting and fishing in constitution

Sen. Brenda Council/Unicameral Information Office photo

Nebraska voters might decide this fall whether state residents will have a constitutional right to hunt, fish and trap.

The legislature has advanced a constitutional amendment, LR 40CA. One more successful vote sends it to the ballot in November.

Sen. Brenda Council of Omaha, during floor debate, accused supporters of moving to head off a threat that doesn’t exist.

“There’s not threat. It’s not real,” Council stated. “It’s imagined and, in fact, it’s exaggerated.”

Other senators criticized the measure as unnecessary and questioned whether it would spawn unintended consequences. They suggested the measure be pulled until supporters more thoroughly considered their objections.

Council, though, proved to be the most vocal critics during debate in the legislative chamber.

She claimed the resolution had little to do with hunting or fishing, but is really just another attempt to keep the Humane Society of the United States from coming to Nebraska to regulate livestock production.

“If we’re afraid of the Humane Society of the United States coming in and stopping the residents of the state of Nebraska from livestock production, why don’t we put it in our constitution that Nebraskans have a constitutional right to raise livestock for consumption,” Council said. “Get to the point.”

Supporters say the threat is real.

Sen. Tony Fulton of Lincoln told colleagues he had hesitated to support the constitutional amendment in the past, believing it wasn’t necessary.

Sen. Pete Pirsch/Unicameral Information Office photo

“But the reason I’ve changed my mind is because I’ve had a chance to reflect on what is actually going on. And that is, the urbanization of Nebraska is causing an entire generation to be removed from theses traditions that we have grown up assuming,” according to Fulton. “And I dare say that if this goes one more generation then folks like HSUS will have fertile ground with which to operate.”

Sponsor Pete Pirsch of Omaha brushed aside the reservations raised by critics and state the resolution is pretty simple.

“The underlying purpose of this LR is to preserve and protect what exists now,” Pirsch said.

LR 40CA needs to win final approval before it goes to the November ballot.

Sister of murder victim campaigns against death penalty (AUDIO)

Miriam Kelle speaks with reporters at the Capitol

The sister of a man brutally murdered nearly 30 years ago campaigns against executing his killer.

A mixture of Mennonite faith and practicality leads Miriam Kelle of Beatrice to come out against the execution of Michael Ryan. Kelle says her faith compels her to speak out against the death penalty. Kelle adds, though, that each time the legislature debates capital punishment, the news media recounts how Michael Ryan tortured and murdered her brother, James Thimm, at his religious compound near Rulo in far southeastern Nebraska in 1984.

Kelle uses a coping mechanism whenever debate at the Capitol turns to capital punishment.

“We just try not to read the paper,” Kelle tells reporters at the Capitol. “You know, I try really hard not. My co-workers are reading it. You just try to go on and do your job that you’re supposed to do.”

That approach didn’t work this year. Kelle actually gathered numerous newspaper accounts of the murder for Sen. Brenda Council of Omaha who sponsors LB 276, a bill that would eliminate the death penalty. Under the legislation, life in prison without the possibility of parole would be the ultimate penalty in Nebraska. The legislature debated the bill for two days last week before Council moved to indefinitely postpone it. The bill could return for debate later this session.

Kelle says it’s difficult to re-read accounts of her brother’s death.

“And the really hard thing is when you read something that you kind of forgot about and it comes crashing back, that’s the hard part,” Kelle says with emotion in her voice.

An execution date of March 6th has been set for Ryan in the 1984 murder. A delay will begin the news cycle over. Kelle contends if Ryan had been sentenced to life he would have been forgotten long ago and she wouldn’t have to relive her brother’s brutal death.

AUDIO:  Brent Martin reports [:40]

Catholic diocese in Nebraska will refuse to comply with federal health care mandate

A Catholic diocese in Nebraska states it will refuse to comply with a federal health care mandate that all employee health care plans cover contraceptives.

A letter was read at all masses in the Lincoln Catholic Diocese over the weekend stating that Bishop Fabian Bruskewitz would not comply with what it terms “the unjust decree” issued by Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.

Diocese Chancellor Father Daniel Rayer told Nebraska Radio Network affiliate KLIN that the federal government has overstepped its bounds.

“The diocese of Lincoln feels that this is an intrusion on the religious liberty of all Catholics and it really is also an intrusion on the religious liberty of all Christians as well,” Rayer said. “There are other Christians who also who would be opposed to this.”

The diocese will not extend coverage of conception services to employees at the diocese or at the hospitals and schools it operates.

Rayer stated the requirement intrudes on religious liberty.

“Never before has the federal government mandated that people have to buy something that violates their conscience, their moral consciences,” Rayer told KLIN.

Jane Monnich with KLIN contributed to this report.

Doctors claim Medicaid cuts make no economic sense (AUDIO)

John Cavanaugh with Building Bright Futures speaks for Children's Health Alliance at news conference

A coalition of Nebraska physicians complains that state budget cuts have hurt access to health care.

Physicians representing the Nebraska Children’s Health Alliance held a news conference in the Capitol rotunda to denounce the 2 ½% cut to the Medicaid budget and argue that the cuts don’t make economic sense.

Dr. Scott Applegate, chairman of the Nebraska Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, says the legislature needs to restore the cut to Medicaid.

“In the year 2011, if you lived in Lincoln, Nebraska, our state’s capital (city), and you are a child new to the Medicaid program, you had access to no pediatricians,” Applegate stated. “There were no pediatricians in the city of Lincoln in 2011 who were able to accept new Medicaid patients.”

John Cavanaugh, executive director of Building Bright Futures of Omaha, stated the Medicaid cuts undermine the ability of poorer children to stay healthy, learn and become productive workers. Cavanaugh said the alliance hopes to persuade the legislature to restore funding and remove regulations that he said keeps some from seeking care.

Cavanaugh and Applegate were joined by Center Pointe Executive Director Topher Hansen and Dr. Robert Rauner, representing the Nebraska Medical Association, at the news conference.

All four emphasized the economics of the cut to the Medicaid budget. The news conference stressed that Nebraska receives $1.40 in federal matching funds for every $1 spent on Medicaid.

Cavanaugh stated that with the federal match and the long-term effects of a lack of health care, budget cuts to Medicaid cannot be justified economically.

“These are without question the most expensive cuts that we can make to our public budget. They cost us more than they gain,” Cavanaugh stated.

AUDIO: Nebraska Children’s Health Alliance news conference [11:40]