May 17, 2012

Lincoln residents praise, pan proposed change to anti-discrimination law

Lincoln residents had their chance to voice support or opposition to a proposed change in the city anti-discrimination ordinance which would add homosexual and transgender residents to the list of protected classes.

The public hearing at city hall lasted for hours Monday. The city council plans to vote on the ordinance next week.

Resident Cynthia Hartley with the group Parents, Family and Friends of Lesbians and Gays told councilmembers that discrimination exists in Lincoln.

“Think about how it would be to live in fear of losing your job every day of your life,” Hartley stated. “It’s not an unfounded fear. P-FLAG has heard from scores of people who have been fired only because they are LGBT.”

Yet, businessman Monte Froelich worries that adding to the list of protected classes would spark more litigation. He told the council that lawsuits based on protected classes aren’t new to local businesses.

“It is the preferred method of vendetta and they are expensive and, frankly, a greater threat than any competition,” according to Froelich. “You cannot be pro-jobs and add another protected class, because it is opposite of fair to business owners.”

Lincoln Public Safety Director Tom Casady spoke as a private citizen in support of the measure.

“I think when you act an ordinance like this you’re defining in clear terms the limits of behavior that we find tolerable in Lincoln,” Casady stated. “And by outlawing minor forms of discrimination and intolerance, you’re also making it less likely that more serious forms of intolerance will occur.”

The council will consider an amendment next week designed to allay fears that the ordinance could infringe on the rights of religious organizations that consider homosexuality immoral. It hasn’t placated all worries about the reach of the ordinance.

Chris Kubat with Catholic Social Services told councilmembers his organization will not violate its beliefs by endorsing behavior it holds as sinful.

“This is an issue of religious freedom. There would be significant gap if we didn’t exist and we will not do anything against our faith. We’ll go away,” Kubat stated.

The ordinance proposes to add gender identity and sexual orientation to the classes specifically protected from discrimination. The ordinance now includes protections from discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, disability, national origin, familial status, ancestry, age or marital status. The law allows people who believe they have been discriminated against to take their complaint before the Lincoln Commission on Human Rights.

KLIN contributed to this report.

Applications now being taken for the Children’s Commission

Applications for the newly created Children’s Commission are being accepted by the governor’s office.

The legislature created the commission in LB 821 approved in the past legislative session.

Gov. Dave Heineman’s office has sent out a news release stating that the governor will accept applications for the Children’s Commission.

The governor’s office notes that the commission, as outlined by the bill, is to include the following voting members:

• director of a child advocacy center;

• administrator of a behavioral health region;

• community representatives from each of the five service areas;

• prosecuting attorney who practices in juvenile court;

• guardian ad litem;

• biological parent currently or previously involved in the child welfare system;

• foster parent;

• court-appointed special advocate (CASA) volunteer;

• member of the state or local Foster Care Review Board;

• child welfare service agency that directly provides child welfare services;

• young adult previously in foster care; and

• representative of a child advocacy organization.

An online application is available at http://www.governor.nebraska.gov/bc/board_comm.html. The governor’s office asks that the position being applied for be designated on the application. The deadline to apply is at the close of the business day Friday, May 12th. Contact Peggy King in the governor’s office at peggy.king@nebraska.gov for more information.

Johanns worries about direction of Obama Administration (AUDIO)

Sen. Mike Johanns speaks to Lincoln Chamber of Commerce/Photo courtesy of Johanns' office

Sen. Mike Johanns says he has observed a disturbing trend in the three-plus years President Obama has been in office.

Johanns, a Republican, says he has nothing personal against Obama, a Democrat, who he has only met a handful of times. He worries, though, about how Obama runs the executive branch.

“I do believe that its direction for the country is really wrong,” Johanns tells Nebraska Radio Network. “I just see too many things where he does things that, quite honestly, are at the constitutional limits. The recess appointments would be a perfect example of that, the way his departments are operating.”

The president angered Congressional Republicans in January by issuing recess appointments for Richard Cordray to lead the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau as well as three nominees to serve on the National Labor Relations Board while the Senate held pro-forma sessions. Republicans contended Obama didn’t have the authority to use the power of a recess appointment, because the Senate wasn’t in recess. A lawsuit has been filed challenging the appointments.

Johanns contends the president purposely misled the country on the cost of the federal health care overhaul, officially named The Affordable Health Care Act and derisively called Obamacare by critics. When Congress approved the bill in 2010, its 10-year price tag was forecast at $938 billion, but little of the bill took effect in 2010 and 2011. A revised forecast by the Congressional Budget Office now pegs the cost at $1.76 trillion over the next 10 years.

Much of Johanns’ criticism is reserved for the departments and agencies that operate within the executive branch, the administration as it is known in Washington. Johanns served in the Bush Administration as Secretary of Agriculture and claims the USDA declined to write rules and enact regulations unless it had clear authority from Congress.

He claims the Obama Administration doesn’t share such a cautious approach.

“What this administration has done, is it has in case after case after case taken a limited grant of authority that they have been given and then stretched it to the extreme,” according to Johanns.

Johanns points to the Environmental Protection Agency as an example. He charges the EPA has taken the limited authority granted under the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts and expanded it far beyond the intention of Congress.

AUDIO: Brent Martin reports [:40]

Sen. Johanns says Washington has entered election mode

Sen. Mike Johanns doesn’t expect much to get done in Washington for the next few months as the election season ramps up.

Johanns, a Republican, says that President Obama, a Democrat, is in election mode.

“If the CEO isn’t willing to lead the effort, then the effort isn’t going to go very far,” Johanns tells Nebraska Radio Network. “That would be true whether you’re president of a small business or a large business or you’re president of the United States or you’re mayor of your community.”

Johanns says the biggest challenge facing the federal government is the growing federal debt. He doesn’t foresee anything getting done until after the November elections. Johanns says neither the president now Congress wants to tackle tough issues in these months leading up to the general election.

The election will come, though. Either President Obama will win re-election or a newly inaugurated President Romney will take over. A new Congress will be sworn in. An old problem will face them, a difficult problem. Johanns says action must follow the elections.

“This is not sustainable; the debt and the deficit. This isn’t going to work for us and it won’t work for us very much longer,” according to Johanns. “You can’t owe this much money and expect it to turn out well.”

Heineman expects illegal immigration to remain an issue (AUDIO)

Gov. Dave Heineman shies away from endorsing an Arizona-style law to crack down on illegal immigration in Nebraska.

Heineman says he has not studied the law debated in oral arguments before the United States Supreme Court, but says a lack of federal action has forced states to try to act.

“We support legal immigration in this state, not illegal immigration. It is a serious issue for this state and the failure of the federal government to act on this issue creates all sorts of challenges. We’ve seen them in Nebraska. You see them in Arizona, in other states across America,” Heineman tells reporters in a conference call.

Arizona law allows police officers to make routine inspections of immigration status during stops. The United States Supreme Court has taken up the case and heard oral arguments in it last week.

Heineman still smarts over the legislature’s move to override his veto of a bill extending state prenatal benefits to illegal immigrants.

“We just had the debate in the last legislative session. I vetoed the bill that would give state-funded benefits to illegal immigrants,” Heineman says. “I don’t think most Nebraskans support that. So, these issues are going to continue to come up.”

Heineman says the money flowing to illegal immigrants will leave less money for core state services, such as education.

AUDIO: Gov. Dave Heineman on Arizona’s illegal immigration law [:20]