• Home
  • Archives
  • Contact Us
    • About
  • Reporters
  • Affiliates
  • Affiliate Support
  • Sports

Nebraska Radio Network

Nebraska News and Sports

  • Legislature & Government
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Agriculture
  • Husker Sports
  • All Topics
  • PostsComments
You are here: Home / Business / Nebraska might soon be taxing on-line purchases; bill advances to final reading

Nebraska might soon be taxing on-line purchases; bill advances to final reading

March 6, 2018 By Brent Martin

Sen. Dan Watermeier/Photo courtesy of Unicameral Information Office

A measure which could well lead to Nebraska collecting sales taxes on Internet purchases has advanced to final reading in the Unicameral.

State lawmakers have voted 34-7 to move LB 44 one step from passage and, perhaps, a veto by Gov. Pete Ricketts.

Sen. Dave Watermeier of Syracuse sponsors the bill. He had to overcome a filibuster on second-round debate, securing one vote more than the 33 necessary.

Sen. Lou Ann Linehan of Elkhorn tells colleagues during legislative floor debate it’s a matter of fairness.

“I don’t see how it’s fair that a group of taxpayers who buy at the local retail store end up paying sales tax and someone who goes on the Internet doesn’t pay the sales tax even though by law they’re supposed to pay the sales tax,” Linehan says.

But, Senator Jim Smith of Papillion derides claims the bill could turn consumers back to their local brick and mortar retailers.

“But colleagues, this is false hope for retailers in our state,” Smith warns. “This does not fix the problem. This is bad legislation.”

Smith vows to continue his opposition even during final reading, during which senators normally vote without debate.

Estimates vary greatly on how profitable Internet sales tax collections could be, ranging from $30 million to as much as $95 million a year.

LB 44 would authorize the state to collect sales taxes on on-line purchases if the U.S. Supreme Court rules in favor of the states in a pending court case. A 1992 decision, Quill v. North Dakota, ruled states could not force a retailer without a physical presence in their state to collect sales taxes. South Dakota is challenging the decision in a case before the court.

Gov. Pete Ricketts opposes the measure, arguing the legislature should wait until the Supreme Court issues its decision. If he vetoes the measure, supporters would need 30 votes to override the veto.

 

 

 

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google

Filed Under: Business, Featured Stories, Legislature & Government, News

Ricketts, Erstad team up for “Live Well” initiative

Husker Spring Game tickets to go on sale February 6th

Husker women on the verge of a win streak

Huskers land walk-on commitment from Kearney QB

Huskers fall at Rutgers 76 to 69

More Big Red News

Featured Stories

Senator warns medical marijuana opponents: petition drive waits in the wings (AUDIO)

Attorney General cautions Nebraska against legalizing medical marijuana (AUDIO)

Legislative leaders see a lot to like in Gov. Ricketts’ proposals (AUDIO)

Gov. Ricketts reveals two-year spending plan, calls for property tax relief in State of the State address (AUDIO)

Turnover rate at Nebraska prisons drops (AUDIO)

TwitterFacebook

Husker Sports

Copeland suffers season-ending injury Saturday, ending his college career

Huskers Drop Third Straight, Falling to the Buckeyes 70-60

Ricketts, Erstad team up for “Live Well” initiative

Husker Spring Game tickets to go on sale February 6th

Husker women on the verge of a win streak

Get our news delivered to your inbox:

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Copyright © 2019 · Learfield News & Ag. LLC